I have dedicated my career to increasing the odds that AI enables human flourishing and [doesn't kill everyone](https://ifanyonebuildsit.com/). I've spent the majority of my (short) career figuring out how to convert money into more useful work to make AI go better with mixed success.

I personally really admire the Midas project and Legal Advocates for Safe Science and Technology. They are both dedicated to creating more accountability from companies that believe they'll replace all human jobs, eradicate all disease, and potentially kill everyone. They're are also both run by friends of mine that I admire and trust.

The stakes are high, the situation is confusing and scary, but I think Midas and LAAST can use our money to make the situation meaningfully better. - Caleb

Make Sure AI Benefits Everyone

the nonprofits

Holding The Hyperscalers Accountable: We monitor leading AI companies to ensure transparency, privacy, and ethics are maintained.

**The Midas Project is a watchdog nonprofit working to ensure that AI technology benefits everybody, not just the companies developing it.**

We lead strategic initiatives to monitor tech companies, counter corporate propaganda, raise awareness about corner-cutting, and advocate for the responsible development of emerging technology.

Note: As an independent watchdog, the Midas Project does not accept direct corporate contributions from companies within the industries we monitor, nor from their leadership. We may also decline any gift that could reasonably compromise our actual or perceived editorial independence.

The Midas Project

LASST is a nonprofit dedicated to using legal advocacy to make advances in science and technology safer for people and the planet.

LASST works through US courts and public advocacy to help push the development of emerging science and technology in a positive direction. We focus primarily on mitigating catastrophic risks from advanced artificial intelligence systems and biotechnology, but we pride ourselves on being practical and responsive. 

***What we've been up to:***

Public advocacy on AI 

- We helped organize the [Not For Private Gain](https://notforprivategain.org/) advocacy coalition, advocating to the Attorneys General of California and Delaware to protect OpenAI’s charitable mission (ensuring artificial general intelligence is safe and benefits all of humanity) from being undermined by the company’s corporate restructuring. Our work helped convince OpenAI to back off its original restructuring proposal and commit to continued nonprofit control, and we continue to advocate for even better outcomes from a safety perspective. 
- We dug into the [corporate filings of xAI](https://lasst.org/2025/08/25/xai-and-public-benefit-corporations-in-ai/), [revealing](https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2025/08/25/elon-musk-xai-dropped-public-benefit-corp-status-while-fighting-openai.html) that despite what it has said to at least one court and the public, it is no longer a public benefit corporation. The revelation shows that AI companies organizing as PBCs (including OpenAI) is not a robust way to ensure safe AI systems.

Developing and filing amicus briefs

- We pulled together a coalition of respected virologists, epidemiologists and public health professionals to file [amicus](https://lasst.org/2024/12/23/lassts-pathogen-research-amicus-brief-project/) [briefs](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pb7vB6yblM7Yj-219tb-g2lkDvWLgggm/view?usp=drive_link) in COVID-origins litigation advocating for outcomes that will deter irresponsibly dangerous research involving pathogens with enhanced pandemic potential.  
- We helped write [the amicus brief Encode filed in the Musk v. Altman litigation](https://encodeai.org/encode-backs-legal-challenge-to-openais-for-profit-switch/), reframing OpenAI’s restructuring as a public interest AI safety issue and catalyzing anti-restructuring public advocacy work. 

Litigation surveillance and research 

- We track what courts are doing on AI and biosafety so we can better advocate in the context of evolving case law (like *Mobley v. Workday*’s holding on deployer liability for the actions of AI agents or *Garcia v. Character Technologies* addressing whether the First Amendment protects chatbot outputs). This helps us find cases where amicus briefs can help influence key judicial decisions or new precedents can be incorporated into impact litigation interventions.
- We’re always doing fact research designed to support legal interventions, including filing public records requests under FOIA and state analogs.

Legal Advocates for Safe Science and Technology (LASST)

1279515062

148788709

1524399316

test

167058366

1873740264

188270313

2052641908

2088874155

We are a nonprofit, so instead of charging fees we rely on the generosity of donors like you.

Choose a donation for Every.org

2140519340

2183212369

2269066361

2310049938

2477281247

2551237796

2880853031

2883383521

2899462032

316638097

3323783059

3381177838

338811242

3705164611

3842241318

3934974605

4167807122

506613571

1287028958

1858760411

2104603717

225261647

2407957277

2729980760

2939442496

3440869557

4143568784

434649596

671754822

87081813

99361

1014384873

1112422858

153399038

2028390811

220342792

2266630408

2519810400

2539558839

2826465835

2843798242

2898624300

3259439560

339774024

3642494300

3902459442

4250940449

472232120

585491400

641510716

91682487

Make Sure AI Benefits Everyone

Supporting

The Midas Project

Legal Advocates for Safe Science and Technology (LASST)

Donors

Become a supporter!

Become a supporter!